![]() The pair usually, but not always, has the same two branch names on both sides of the colon : between them. The "refspec" is, at its second-simplest, just a pair of branch names, like master:master, develop:develop, and the like. I used the word "refspec" above several times, without ever defining it. If, as in your example, you're currently on master and it merges with origin's master, Git will run the git merge step using whatever new stuff it brought in that went under origin/master (note the slash here). For this part, Git cares mightily about which branch you're on now, and which "remote branch" 3 it merges with. (In sufficiently old versions of Git I think the pull command gets more restrictive during the fetch step.)īut, having potentially fetched and updated all the origin/* remote-tracking branches, the pull code moves on to the git merge step. This means that either git fetch (assuming origin) or git fetch origin will update all your remote-tracking branches for origin, provided you are running a reasonably modern (1.8.4 or later) Git. If you don't pass extra arguments, git fetch will fetch the default set of refspecs for the remote, which is normally 2 "all branches". In versions of Git predating 1.8.4, this prevented git fetch from updating any of your remote-tracking branches, but since 1.8.4, explicitly fetching branch br also updates your origin/ br (assuming the remote in question is named origin). For instance, if you git fetch origin br, the fetch step gets the name of the remote ( origin) and br as a "refspec". ![]() 1 The pull command passes most of its arguments right through to the fetch step. Remember, git pull is basically shorthand for git fetch followed by git merge. But be prepared for Git documentation to use their terminology. Instead of remote branch, I like to say branch name as seen on the other (remote) Git repository instead of remote-tracking branch name (e.g., origin/master), I call this a remote-tracking name and instead of tracking branch, I use the phrase branch name with an upstream set. Long after I wrote this answer originally, I find these terms just confuse people-including me!-and these days, I prefer my own terminology. ![]() Note that these are terms that Git (and ) use. Sidebar: Make sure you correctly understand the differences between what the Git documentation calls remote branches, remote-tracking branches and tracking branches to take full advantage of the following explanations. The pull command allows options, and many of these have interesting (and confusing and potentially very un-nice) effects. We can use the pull command git pull origin masterīut it should be followed by the origin and master or your customized branch name.The short answer is "no"-or maybe even "no and yes", if one reads only the title of your question-but this is somewhat misleading. In another word, we can use only one git command to execute the previous two commands. git mergeīy this command to merge and add a commit to the latest change in the local branch. And the next command already happening inside git pull is "git merge". The fetching command is to update the current track of the local branch. The fetch git command like this git fetch Two both are the process of git pull, the first one does a fetching, and the second one does a merging to the local branch. Git pull has two parts to download the latest modifications, they are Git Pull Remote Branch to Local Branchīefore using this command you have to understand what git pull does. In general, the git branch is a thing like you define another pointer through the development. In the git remote control system, there is a main branch called master but you can create another name using the next git command. While pull is only one command of many other commands inside the remote control system that already doing fetch and merging the remote branch into the local branch.Įntirely, to git pull remote branch to local branch. firstly you have to ensure which the current name is in your local stage. Actually, git is a general remote control system that allows users or developers to download and upload the project source code between them. Have you tried to use git to pull a remote branch to a local branch and you faced a problem? if yes this article will help you to understand the problem and getting fix it in a moment.īefore we get started we just need to understand what is git pull.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |